The UK’s
Department for International Development (DFID) recently announced the welcome
news that all publically-funded development research is to become freely available. As the recent ‘Academic Spring’ debate attests, this is good news
for most, not least of all southern researchers who rank accessing research
high up a long list of problems they face when trying to engage with the wider development
community.
“Charging
the developing world to see findings of new scientific research will mean fewer
people escape poverty and could cost lives” warned International Development
Secretary Andrew Mitchell as he set out the Department’s new open
access policy. “Even the most
groundbreaking research is of no use to anyone if it sits on a shelf gathering
dust… What's just as important, though, is ensuring that these findings get
into the hands of those in the developing world who stand to gain most from
putting them into practical use.”
Although some may disagree, surely any attempts to make
research available easily and at little or no cost to researchers in developing
world deserve applause (bravo, Eldis)? Yes… but while open access
initiatives and policies such as these are hugely significant, it’s important
to understand that the ‘apartheid of knowledge and analysis’ (as Duncan Green of Oxfam puts it) doesn’t end with improving access.
As a programme dedicated to promoting and sharing
knowledge from and for the Global South, GDNet has
long been aware of the barriers that southern researchers experience to having their knowledge
influence global debates on development. GDNet recently identified other key
challenges: securing
research funding, communicating research findings to peers and policy
audiences, and the (mis)perceptions of the quality of southern research, and
concluded that a change in personal attitudes towards
research from developing countries is also necessary.
Leading by example, GDNet has launched Connect South, a campaign to encourage members of the development research
and policy communities to adopt a more inclusive approach to southern research.
The campaign calls on people and organisations working in development to
pledge how they will help southern researchers
to communicate their work better and more widely. The organization has launched its own Charter of Commitment to southern research which they are hoping will inspire other
organizations to do the same.
Ensuring
that research findings get into the hands of those who stand to gain most from
putting them into practice is one thing. Recognising the value southern research offers to
global discussions on development is quite another. If development research is
to make the impact DFID wants it to, both need an equal chance to succeed.
Join the
campaign at linkd.in/ConnectSouth
The UK’s
Department for International Development (DFID) recently announced the welcome
news that all publically-funded development research is to become freely available. As the recent ‘Academic Spring’ debate attests, this is good news
for most, not least of all southern researchers who rank accessing research
high up a long list of problems they face when trying to engage with the wider development
community.
“Charging
the developing world to see findings of new scientific research will mean fewer
people escape poverty and could cost lives” warned International Development
Secretary Andrew Mitchell as he set out the Department’s new open
access policy. “Even the most
groundbreaking research is of no use to anyone if it sits on a shelf gathering
dust… What's just as important, though, is ensuring that these findings get
into the hands of those in the developing world who stand to gain most from
putting them into practical use.”
Although some may disagree, surely any attempts to make
research available easily and at little or no cost to researchers in developing
world deserve applause (bravo, Eldis)? Yes… but while open access
initiatives and policies such as these are hugely significant, it’s important
to understand that the ‘apartheid of knowledge and analysis’ (as Duncan Green of Oxfam puts it) doesn’t end with improving access.
As a programme dedicated to promoting and sharing
knowledge from and for the Global South, GDNet has
long been aware of the barriers that southern researchers experience to having their knowledge
influence global debates on development. GDNet recently identified other key
challenges: securing
research funding, communicating research findings to peers and policy
audiences, and the (mis)perceptions of the quality of southern research, and
concluded that a change in personal attitudes towards
research from developing countries is also necessary.
Leading by example, GDNet has launched Connect South, a campaign to encourage members of the development research
and policy communities to adopt a more inclusive approach to southern research.
The campaign calls on people and organisations working in development to
pledge how they will help southern researchers
to communicate their work better and more widely. The organization has launched its own Charter of Commitment to southern research which they are hoping will inspire other
organizations to do the same.
Ensuring
that research findings get into the hands of those who stand to gain most from
putting them into practice is one thing. Recognising the value southern research offers to
global discussions on development is quite another. If development research is
to make the impact DFID wants it to, both need an equal chance to succeed.
Join the
campaign at linkd.in/ConnectSouth