Wiki Index
- Back to top
- Theory of change
- Theory of change vs Logframes
- Summary of e-discussion on evaluating the impact of KB work
- Reflexive Monitoring in Action (RMA)
- M&E/evaluation frameworks
- Realistic evaluation
- General M&E resources
- Ideas for self-tagging
- M & E specific to knowledge brokers and intermediaries
- Measuring the impact of knowledge management
- The need/role for knowledge intermediaries
- Evaluating policy influence
- Evaluating agricultural extension work
- Evaluating research impact/communication
- Guides to and definitions of evaluation
Latest Activity
edited the wiki page Wiki homepage
4 months ago
4 months ago
edited the wiki page Attribution for KBs | Resources of attribution
4 months ago
4 months ago
edited the wiki page Attribution for KBs | Summary of e-discussion on attribution for KBs - 2) Contribution to outcomes
4 months ago
4 months ago
edited the wiki page Attribution for KBs | Summary of e-discussion on attribution for KBs - 2) Contribution to outcomes
4 months ago
4 months ago
edited the wiki page Attribution for KBs | Summary of e-discussion on attribution for KBs - 1) Attributing authorship
4 months ago
4 months ago
Share
Realistic evaluation
Realistic evaluation
realistic-evaluation
“It goes beyond the theory of change model to explore the patterns of change generated in a given context (and in terms of KB work) from a series of interventions including the use of tacit /explicit experiential knowledge as well as academic knowledge”.
Razia Shariff, Third Sector Research Centre, U.K
Also see a brief introduction to realistic evaluation (doc). It states “One of the tasks of a realist evaluation is to make the theories within a program explicit, by developing clear hypotheses about how, and for whom, programs might ‘work’. The implementation of the program, and the evaluation of it, then tests those hypotheses. This means collecting data, not just about program impacts, or the processes of program implementation, but about the specific aspects of program context that might impact on program outcomes, and about the specific mechanisms that might be creating change”.
Realistic evaluation has been applied and evaluated in a knowledge broker health setting by Vicky Ward see:
Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: a thematic analysis of the literature
Vicky Ward, Allan House and Susan Hamer
This paper describes the development of a conceptual framework of translating knowledge into action and discusses how it can be used for developing a useful model of the knowledge transfer process. Abstract only, unless subscribed to journal.
Create New Page
Discussion
or