Wiki Index
- Back to top
- Theory of change
- Theory of change vs Logframes
- Summary of e-discussion on evaluating the impact of KB work
- Reflexive Monitoring in Action (RMA)
- M&E/evaluation frameworks
- Realistic evaluation
- General M&E resources
- Ideas for self-tagging
- M & E specific to knowledge brokers and intermediaries
- Measuring the impact of knowledge management
- The need/role for knowledge intermediaries
- Evaluating policy influence
- Evaluating agricultural extension work
- Evaluating research impact/communication
- Guides to and definitions of evaluation
intermediaries evaluation frameworks monitoring and evaluation evaluation health impact knowledge brokering information impact evaluation knoweldge brokers case studies knowledge brokers policy dialogue theory of change attribution policy policy briefs development outcome mapping Professional identities
Latest Activity
edited the wiki page Wiki homepage
4 months ago
4 months ago
edited the wiki page Attribution for KBs | Resources of attribution
4 months ago
4 months ago
edited the wiki page Attribution for KBs | Summary of e-discussion on attribution for KBs - 2) Contribution to outcomes
4 months ago
4 months ago
edited the wiki page Attribution for KBs | Summary of e-discussion on attribution for KBs - 2) Contribution to outcomes
4 months ago
4 months ago
edited the wiki page Attribution for KBs | Summary of e-discussion on attribution for KBs - 1) Attributing authorship
4 months ago
4 months ago
Share
Summary of e-discussion on evaluating the impact of KB work
Summary of e-discussion on evaluating the impact of KB work
summary-of-e-discussion-on-evaluating-impact-of-kb-work
The discussion reached some areas of consensus and began to explore other areas outlined below. Each section contains links to the wide range of resources shared:
- Understanding the purpose of your work is the basis for evaluation: the debate stressed the value of both generic planning frameworks (e.g. Theory of Change, Social Framework) and frameworks specific to knowledge brokering
- Be clear why you are evaluating your work: there are various reasons for undertaking an evaluation that will shape what questions you ask and what methods you use
- Understand what you mean by impact: the changes that KBs are seeking to generate include changes in effectiveness, policies, behaviour, indicators of wellbeing and different kinds of impact
- The challenge of indicators and metrics: there are currently few good indicators and metrics for KB work - indicators will depend on what you are trying to achieve, but there is potential to collectively develop thinking in this area
- Methodologies and approaches: there are a range of different approaches that KBs can use, from case studies and surveys, to propensity score matching.
This debate is intended to feed into and catalyse future action to help strengthen our individual and collective understanding of how to evaluate the impact of KB work. Ideas for future activities that are worth considering include:
1. Sharing what we are actually doing, methods indicators metrics etc
2. Build a sector wide bank of impact case studies, possibly linked to a theory of change
3. Create a guide that suggests different evaluation approaches/questions/metrics and methods that are appropriate to understanding different kinds of impact.
You can dowload the discussion summary at http://bit.ly/xxBKTy (pdf)
You can also view the resources shared in this discussion on the KBF wiki and in the KBF Impact Resources document (pdf). Full links below:
KBF wiki: http://www.knowledgebrokersforum.org/wiki
KBF Impact resources (pdf): http://bit.ly/wAzLZc
Create New Page
Discussion
or